Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Bennett

California Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1941No. Sac. 5420, 5447PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

In July, 1934, the plaintiffs commenced an action in the Superior Court of Lassen County against some two hundred defendants to quiet title to their asserted rights in and to the use of the waters of the Susan River. On August 21, 1934, the court made an order of reference to the division of water resources, department of public works. On April 18, 1940, the court rendered its final decree based in the main on the report filed by the referee. Subsequently, on the same day, the court made a supplemental order providing for water master supervision by said division of water resources of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Heiner v. DonnanSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Pacific Live Stock Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Rancho Santa Margarita v. VailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. City of Barstow v. Mojave Water AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Allen v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Tehachapi-Cummings County Water District v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API