Legal Opinion

Whitely v. Mississippi Water Power & Boom Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 15, 1888PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Crow Wing-county, Sleeper, J., presiding, setting aside a verdict of $2,500 in condemnation proceedings. The commissioners had awarded $740; and plaintiff had appealed from the award.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

These proceedings were instituted for the condemnation of certain lands of the plaintiff, appellant, lying in the-county of Crow Wing, found necessary to be appropriated for the-corporate use and purposes of the respondent company. The plaintiff appealed, from the award of the commissioners appointed to appraise damages, to the district court, where a reassessment by the jury resulted in a large increase in the amount awarded. A new trial was granted upon defendant’s application, and against the objection of the plaintiff, on the ground, chiefly, that the verdict was-*524not, in the judgment of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. PatchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Rheiner v. Union Depot, Street Railway & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nadeau v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Aaronson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
  3. Atlantic C. L. Ry. Co. v. Enterprise Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Beekman v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Mantorville Railway & Transfer Co. v. Teunis SlingerlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API