Baird v. Kottke
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action on a promissory note. The defendant and respondent admits in his answer that he executed the note, but alleges that it was an accommodation note without consideration. The case was tried to a jury, and a verdict was returned for the defendant and from a judgment entered thereon, the plaintiff appeals.
After the plaintiff had rested, and the defendant proceeded to offer his testimony, appellant objected upon the grounds, and for the reason, that the testimony shows that the note was signed and went into the bank as an asset, and was in the bank as an asset at the time the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Gans v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Young v. BlakemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Llewellyn Iron Works v. Abbott Kidney Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Vallely v. DevaneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rath v. Armour and CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965