Legal Opinion
Rath v. Armour and Company
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1965No. 8129PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES MORRIS, Commissioner.
The plaintiff alleges that:
“They are the duly elected and acting members of the Capitol Milk Patrons Committee, elected by the patrons themselves to take charge of and operate on a temporary basis the business known as Capitol Milk Products Company of Bismarck, North Dakota, and that they bring this action on their own individual behalf and on behalf of all other patrons similarly situated.”
The defendant is a Delaware corporation, with principal offices in Chicago, Illinois, and a branch in Saint Paul, Minnesota, and is authorized to do business in the State of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Oppenheimer v. F. J. Young & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Kainz v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
- Vaux v. HamiltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Farmers Cooperative Ass'n of Churchs Ferry v. ColeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Beck v. LindNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Lucas v. Pioneer, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Ets-Hokin & Galvan, Inc. v. Maas Transport, Inc., and B. L. Lawrence, D/B/A Lawrence TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Heller v. Production Credit Ass'n of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.