Legal Opinion
Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corporation
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided March 10, 1982No. File 231516PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtD. Dorsey, J.
This action to recover damages for allegedly false representations made in connection with the sale of a motor vehicle and for failure to honor express and implied warranties was retried by the court after a judgment dismissing the complaint had been reversed in part and sustained in part by the Supreme Court. Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corporation, 184 Conn. 607, 440 A.2d 810 (1981). The plaintiffs’ original complaint contained six counts. The Supreme Court sustained the trial court’s dismissal, pursuant to Practice Book § 302, of counts one, three and six, but required a retrial on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Aronberg v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Murphy v. McNamaraConnecticut Superior Court · 1979
- Covenant Radio Corporation v. Ten Eighty CorporationConnecticut Superior Court · 1977
- Standard Oil Company of California v. Federal Trade Commission, Batten, Barton, Durstine & Osborn, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Richards v. Direct Energy Servs., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Richards v. Direct Energy Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- Moldex, Inc. v. Ogden Engineering Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1987
- Leasecomm Corporation v. Forrest, No. 0239414s (Oct. 14, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.