Legal Opinion

Murphy v. McNamara

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided December 5, 1979No. File 173772PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.

The plaintiff has brought this action for damages and equitable relief based upon a three count complaint wherein the following is alleged: violations of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (hereinafter the CUTPA), General Statutes §§ 42-110a et seq.; violations of the unconscionable contracts section of the Uniform Commercial Code, General Statutes §42a-2-302; and viola tions of the usury law, General Statutes § 37-4. Before the court is an application to continue an ex parte temporary injunction issued on September 19, 1979.

The plaintiff is a recipient of welfare and has four minor…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Hume v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Education SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1937

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. McLaughlin Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Rathke v. MacFarlaneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. Ivey, Barnum & O'Mara v. Indian Harbor Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Winton v. Johnson & Dix Fuel Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  5. Bailey Employment System, Inc. v. Clifford Hahn v. Shelton Leighton, Additional on Counterclaim-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API