Legal Opinion
Standard Oil Company of California v. Federal Trade Commission, Batten, Barton, Durstine & Osborn, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 3, 1978No. 75-1341PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
577 F.2d 653
47 A.L.R.Fed. 375, 1978-2 Trade Cases 62,145,
4 Media L. Rep. 1459
STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent.
BATTEN, BARTON, DURSTINE & OSBORN, INC., Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent.
No. 75-1341, 75-1342.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
July 3, 1978.
Francis R. Kirkham (argued), San Francisco, Cal., Lawrence G. Meyer (argued), Washington, D. C., for petitioners.
David M. Fitzgerald (argued), Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Petitions to Review an Order of the Federal Trade Commission.
Before CUMMINGS,*…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Federal Trade Commission v. National Lead Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- American Home Products Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Borden, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Sears, Roebuck and Co., a Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.