Legal Opinion
Hinkle v. Gauntt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 3, 1949No. 33286PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHalley, J.
E. C. Gauntt instituted this action on July 19, 1946, to quiet title to an undivided 7/16 interest in the minerals and mineral rights in a tract of 40 acres of land in Carter county, Okla., alleged to have been acquired by him in a deed from John Hinkle, deceased. It is shown that the *433successors in interest of John Hinkle were asserting some interest in the mineral rights so acquired by him, and prayed that his title be quieted and the defendants perpetually barred from asserting any interest therein.
The answering defendants admitted that they claimed an interest in that portion of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Burns v. BastienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Douglas v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Carroll v. BowenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Melton v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Swearingen v. OldhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Simson v. LangholfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
- Stratmann v. StratmannSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- Corlett v. CoxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- Elliott v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Little v. Mountain View Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.