Legal Opinion

People v. Wagner

California Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 2009No. S156537PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

In this case we construe the statutory speedy sentencing provisions contained in Penal Code sections 1203.2a and 1381 1 with regard to defendants who are placed on probation with the imposition of sentence suspended for one offense and who, while still on probation, are convicted of an unrelated misdemeanor or felony and imprisoned in either county jail or state prison on the unrelated offense. We also consider how the two statutes relate to each other.

For a defendant placed on probation with imposition of sentence suspended who is subsequently incarcerated for a second…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. People v. LoeunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. People v. KaramanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. LeivaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People v. ContrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. People v. MendozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. Murdock, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. People v. EspinosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API