Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Spillman v. Heldt

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1927No. 25619PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This action was brought by the state on the relation of O. S. Spillman, attorney general, against George Heldt, de*437fendant, to restrain and enjoin defendant from interfering and preventing the agents of the department of agriculture from entering upon defendant’s premises, examining, and testing his cattle for bovine tuberculosis, in Saunders county, and carrying out the law of the state and the rules and regulations of the department of agriculture in reference to bovine tuberculosis eradication.. The main issues tendered by the' answer may be epitomized as follows: (1) That an injunction was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Houston v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Durand v. DysonIllinois Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Loftus v. Department of Agriculture of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  2. Patrick v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Beck v. Associates Discount Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  4. The People v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Kroplin v. TruaxOhio Supreme Court · 1929

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API