Legal Opinion
Kroplin v. Truax
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 6, 1929No. 21344PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The broad question raised by the instant action is the constitutionality of certain sections of the so-called Riggs Law, which is embodied in Sections 1121-1 to 1121-25, General Code. This act provides for the examination, inspection, and testing of cattle for bovine tuberculosis, and, under certain circumstances, for the summary destruction of the diseased animal.
Section 1121-1 provides that the owner of any herd may petition the department of agriculture for an examination of his herd for tuberculosis;
Section 1121-2 provides for the use of metal numbered tags in case such cattle pass a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Houston v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Lowe v. ConroyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Fevold v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- City of New Orleans v. CharouLeauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Donald P. RohrigCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Estado Libre Asociado v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1984
- Herbert F. Steigler v. Raymond W. Anderson, Warden, Delaware Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Raymond Paul GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.