Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 31, 1939No. 28014PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

The plaintiff below appeals from a judgment of the district court of Hughes county rendered' on a verdict for defendant in an action to recover damages for conversion of certain cattle and a truck. The parties will be referred to in the. order of their appearance at the trial.

The defense was conducted on the theory that defendant purchased the property from plaintiff’s husband, who was in possession thereof as owner, or as agent of plaintiff or as a partner of the plaintiff in the business of buying and selling livestock.

Plaintiff says the court erred in refusing her requested Instructions…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Howard v. ManningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Dobbins v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Stekoll v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Watkins v. HuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Hawkins v. WindhorstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reinhart & Donovan Co. v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Layton v. PurcellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Champlin Oil and Refining Company v. RoeverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  5. Price v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API