Legal Opinion

Layton v. Purcell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 2, 1954No. 35840PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

Defendant in error, widow and adminis-tratrix of the estate of Elmer Purcell, deceased, obtained a verdict and judgment against'plaintiff in error, as defendant, for damages said plaintiff sustained by reason of her deceased husband’s death when his automobile collided with defendant’s truck. .Defendant has perfected this appeal. The parties will hereinafter be referred to by their trial court designations.

The collision occurred at about 6:30 P. M., while the deceased was driving west and defendant was driving east on’ Highway No. 10, a gravel road west of Welch, Oklahoma.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tulsa Hospital Ass'n v. JubySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Fowler v. FowlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Byrd v. McKoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  5. Bilby v. OwenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Badillo v. Mid Century Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. Patton v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. May-Li Barki, M.D., Inc. v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. McMillan v. Lane Wood & CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Harris v. ConwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API