Watkins v. Huff
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.
This was an action by plaintiffs in error as plaintiffs below, against the defendant in error defendants below, to recover the sum of $1,018.50, with interest, upon a check signed “Hollis Garage, by J. A. Hawke,” drawn on the City National Bank of Hollis, payable to the order of “Auto Sales Co.” and given in payment for an automobile.
Summons was duly served on the defendant F. M. Huff, but the defendant J. A. Hawke was not found.- Huff filed answer in which, after denying generally the allegations of plaintiffs’ petition, he averred that J. A. Hawke had no authority to issue the check made…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Locke v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- First Nat. Bank of Mounds v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Gigoux v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Nero v. NeroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Smyth v. STRADERSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Cushing v. BucklesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Gourley v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Houston v. McCrorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Wilson v. HolmesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Nowata Oil Syndicate v. Commercial Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.