Curcio Webb LLC v. National Benefit Programs Agency, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARBLEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on Defendant, National Benefit Programs, Inc.’s, 1 (“National Benefit”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [Docket No. 15]. For the reasons set forth herein, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
II. BACKGROUND
A. Facts
Plaintiff, Curcio Webb, is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Illinois, and has a place of business in San Francisco, California. Curcio Webb is an employee benefits and human…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- In Re Delorean Motor Company, Debtor. David W. Allard, Jr. v. Howard L. Weitzman, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bishop v. Oakstone AcademyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- Probst v. Central Ohio Youth CenterDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- Dexxon Digital Storage, Inc. v. HaenszelOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Caskey v. FentonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
- Chiusa v. StubenrauchDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.