Legal Opinion
Kamakazi Music Corp. v. Robbins Music Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 29, 1982No. 80 Civ. 2877 (RWS)PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Currently pending in this action by plaintiffs Kamakazi Music Corp. (“Kamakazi”), Barry Manilow (“Manilow”), and Warner Brothers Publications, Inc. (“Warner”) against defendants Robbins Music Corp. (“Robbins”) and Vicks Lithograph, Inc. (“Vicks”) for copyright infringement are several motions, both substantive and procedural. Robbins has moved for a stay of all further proceedings pending the determination of the appeal from a partial judgment entered by this court in favor of Kamakazi and in the alternative for summary judgment dismissing all remaining claims…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- On Davis v. The Gap, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Crump v. Beckley Newspapers, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- Stephanie Hays and Gail MacDonald v. Sony Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Don King Productions, Inc. v. DouglasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Brown v. AmesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.