Legal Opinion

Latino v. Crane Rental Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 7, 1994PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The trial judge concluded, based on his post-verdict investigation, that the jury did not in fact reach the special verdicts for the plaintiff that were announced and affirmed in open court. He therefore granted the defendant Crane a new trial, the jury having been discharged more than a week earlier. When, however, a single justice of the Appeals Court, on the plaintiff’s request for interlocutory relief, ruled that the new trial order was “without force,” the trial judge ordered that judgment be entered pursuant to the verdicts returned in open court.

We allowed Crane’s application for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Woodward v. LeavittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Randall v. Peerless Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. Commonwealth v. FidlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Sam Fox D/B/A a & M Sales Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bishop v. GenTec Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Jamgochian v. DierkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. DiBenedettoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
  4. Roseme v. TolbertMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2005
  5. Andrea Trescot, M.D. and Algone Center, LLC v. Tabatha Foy, Mark Foy, Michael Foy, and Alissa Foy, a minor childAlaska Supreme Court · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API