Legal Opinion
Sam Fox D/B/A a & M Sales Company v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 30, 1969No. 25374PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SINGLETON, District Judge:
This appeal is from a judgment and decree entered by the district court pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 334(a) of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act condemning quantities of a drug product marketed by appellant under the name of “Ordinex” and certain labeling accompanying the drug product. 1 The decree and judgment was entered upon a jury verdict returned in favor of appellee, and appellant now appeals, asserting numerous points of error. After giving thorough consideration to the record made in the court below and the briefs submitted' by counsel on appeal, we have concluded…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Palmer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Julian S. H. WEINER, Marvin Al Lichtig and Solomon Block, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- University Computing Co. v. Lykes-Youngstown Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Frederick Leon Dotson, and Reginald OwensCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Sellars v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- York Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.