Legal Opinion
Jamgochian v. Dierker
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided July 24, 1997PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.
These consolidated tort actions arise from a two-vehicle automobile accident which the plaintiffs claim was caused by the negligence of Peter P. Dierker. In response to special questions, a jury composed of fourteen jurors decided *566that Dierker was not negligent. Judgments were entered for the defendants. The judge denied the plaintiffs’ joint motion for judgments notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial on the ground that the verdicts were against the weight of the evidence. The plaintiffs appealed from the judgments and the order denying their joint motion,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Shafir v. SteeleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Brossi v. FisherMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
- Commonwealth v. FernandesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Kimball v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
- Zarrilli v. Sandoz Pharmaceutical Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.