Legal Opinion

Roseme v. Tolbert

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided September 26, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.

The plaintiff incurred medical expenses for chiropractic treatment following a motor vehicle accident with the defendant. A jury found that the defendant’s negligence was the sole proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries, and awarded damages to the plaintiff in the exact amount of his medical bills; namely, $2,400.00. The plaintiff filed a motion for an additur or a new trial on the grounds that the jury’s limitation of its award to the dollar amount of his special damages indicated that the jury did not allow any compensation for his pain and suffering, and that the failure to award such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Loschi v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  2. Cassamasse v. J.G. Lamotte & Son, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. Bolton v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  4. Proctor v. North Shore Community Arts FoundationMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  5. Latino v. Crane Rental Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011
  2. Rizzo v. CotterMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API