Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. DiBenedetto

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 11, 2019No. AC 17-P-1012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMassing, J.

*682 As a general rule, evidence of a jury's internal thought processes cannot be used to impeach a verdict. In this appeal, we consider whether this rule applies when the judge learns, after a guilty verdict has been affirmed and recorded, that the jurors *154 misunderstood the unanimity instruction and convicted the defendant by a vote of four to two. Concluding that the rule does apply -- and that the judge should have accepted the original verdict instead of sending the jurors out to continue deliberations, resulting in a second guilty verdict -- we affirm the defendant's conviction in the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Pena-Rodriguez v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. Burch v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Woodward v. LeavittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Scot Douglas DavisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2025
  2. Karen Read v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API