Commonwealth v. DiBenedetto
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtMassing, J.
*682 As a general rule, evidence of a jury's internal thought processes cannot be used to impeach a verdict. In this appeal, we consider whether this rule applies when the judge learns, after a guilty verdict has been affirmed and recorded, that the jurors *154 misunderstood the unanimity instruction and convicted the defendant by a vote of four to two. Concluding that the rule does apply -- and that the judge should have accepted the original verdict instead of sending the jurors out to continue deliberations, resulting in a second guilty verdict -- we affirm the defendant's conviction in the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Pena-Rodriguez v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Burch v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Woodward v. LeavittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Scot Douglas DavisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2025
- Karen Read v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025