Legal Opinion
San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. G.F.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 11, 2011No. D058522PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’ROURKE, J.
G.F. contends the juvenile court abused its discretion and violated her due process rights when it denied her request for a contested postpermanency review hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.3.1 We reverse the order.
Section 366.3, subdivision (f), states the parent of a child in long-term foster care is entitled “to participate in” a postpermanency review hearing. *327Here, at a 12-month permanency review, the parent of a child in long-term foster care disputed the social service agency’s evidence and recommendations and requested a contested hearing. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Carlos R.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. Y.M. (In re Maria Q.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- In re A.H. CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2014
- In re Alberto F. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
- In re J.M. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.