Legal Opinion
San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. Y.M. (In re Maria Q.)
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided October 23, 2018No. D073296PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHuffman, J.
Thomas E. Montgomery, County Counsel, John Philips, Chief Deputy and Jesica Fellman, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency.
Gary S. Plavnick for Respondent N.Z.
*581This appeal concerns whether the relative placement preference under *380Welfare & Institutions Code 1 section 361.3 applies to a relative's request for placement after the juvenile court has held a section 366.26 hearing and the child remains in foster care pursuant to section 366.26, subdivision (b)(7). Before we set out the arguments, we briefly describe the unusual…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- In Re Stephanie M.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Cynthia D. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Christina N.California Court of Appeal · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sonoma Cnty. Human Servs. Dep't v. Heather B. (In re C.W.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- C.C. v. Superior Court CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- In re A.H. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- In re A.H. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- In re D.D. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.