Bruner v. Kansas Moline Plow Co.
Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory
Appeal from the United States Court for the Southern District of the Indian Territory; before Justice J. T. Dickerson, May 1, 1906. Action by the Kansas Moline Plow Company against H. S. Bruner and others. From a judgment for plaintiff defendants appeal.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the United States Court for the Southern District of the Indian Territory; before Justice J. T. Dickerson, May 1, 1906. Action by the Kansas Moline Plow Company against H. S. Bruner and others. From a judgment for plaintiff defendants appeal. The appellee, the Kansas Moline Plow Company, brought its action against the appellants for the sum of $1,223.21 together with interest for goods, wares, and merchandise sold and delivered by appellee to the appellants at the special instance and request of said appellants, and attached to their complaint an itemized account. An order of…
1Opinion of the CourtClayton, J.
(after stating the facts as above). There are 27 specifications of error in the assignment. The second is as follows: “Error of court in overruling and denying the application of plaintiff in error'for a change of venue.” The motion and supporting affidavit are as follows: “Now comes the defendants in the above-styled cause and moves the court to grant them a change of venue in the above cause for the reason that the prejudice against the defendants in the division of the Southern district of the Indian Territory in which said cause is pending is so great that the defendants cannot obtain a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Tallapoosa Lumber Co. v. HolbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Murphy Varnish Co. v. ConnellNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- M. I. Wilcox Cordage & Supply Co. v. MosherMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Wagner v. J. & G. Meakin, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thomas v. Hudson Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Cargile v. Union State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- M. J. Grove Lime Co. v. WolfendenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Pacific States Automotive Finance Corp. v. AddisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
- Jones v. Bankers' Trust Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1916