Legal Opinion

M. I. Wilcox Cordage & Supply Co. v. Mosher

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1897PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Bay; Kelley, J., presiding. Case by the M. I. Wilcox Cordage & Supply Company against George L. Mosher and others, directors of Mosher, Bissell & Mather, a corporation, based upon the statute requiring directors to file an annual report. From a judgment for defendants on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is an action brought to recover from the directors of a corporation a debt of the corporation to plaintiff, and is based upon the willful neglect of the directors to file the annual report of the corporation’s affairs in January, 1895, as required by Act No. 232 of the Public Acts of 1885. Defendants were sole directors of a corporation known as Mosher, Bissell & Mather, which was doing business in West Bay City during the year 1895, and for two years prior thereto. Defendants Mosher and Bissell were president and secretary of said corporation, respectively. No annual report of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coit & Co. v. SuttonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Patterson v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  3. Van Etten v. EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Bank of Saginaw v. PiersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Gennert v. IvesMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kirven v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1906
  2. Sucker State Drill Co. v. WirtzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  3. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Swartley v. Oak Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Bruner v. Kansas Moline Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API