Barger v. Peters
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman
The question in this case is whether Public Act 88— 311, which excludes inmates from the opportunity to increase good-conduct credit, violates the ex post facto clauses of the Federal and Illinois Constitutions (U.S. Const., art. I, § 10; Ill. Const. 1970, art. I, § 16). We hold that it does.
BACKGROUND
As of September 10, 1990, section 3 — 6—3 of the Unified Code of Corrections applied a multiplier to increase the "day for a day” credit certain prisoners could earn toward early release. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 38, par. 1003 — 6—3 (amended by Pub. Act 86 — 1373, eff. September 10, 1990).)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Birkett v. KonetskiIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. CorneliusIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- Gregory J. Moore v. Steven C. BryantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Fletcher v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. StarnesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.