Legal Opinion

Fletcher v. Williams

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1997No. 81599-81601PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Freeman

Section 3 — 3—5(f) of the Unified Code of Corrections formerly required the Illinois Prisoner Review Board, after initially denying a prisoner parole, to schedule a parole hearing for the prisoner every year. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 38, par. 1003 — 3—5®. That section, as amended, now permits the Board to schedule a prisoner’s next parole hearing at an interval of up to three years "if the Board finds that it is not reasonable to expect that parole would be granted at a hearing prior to the scheduled rehearing date.” 730 ILCS 5/3 — 3—5(f) (West 1996).

At issue is whether amended Corrections…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  3. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. People v. MalchowIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People Ex Rel. Birkett v. KonetskiIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  3. People v. CorneliusIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People Ex Rel. Lumpkin v. CassidyIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Ashley v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API