Legal Opinion
Sackett v. Santilli
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 12, 2000No. 44892-7-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
5 P.3d 11 (2000)
101 Wash.App. 128
Russell and Carolyn SACKETT, husband and wife, Respondent,
v.
Thomas A. SANTILLI, Appellant.
No. 44892-7-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
June 12, 2000.
Shellie McGaughey, Bellevue, for Appellant.
Charles E. Peery, Peery, Hiscock, Pierson & Ryder, Seattle, for Respondent,
WEBSTER, J.
Russell and Carolyn Sackett sued Thomas Santilli for negligence in a motor vehicle accident. Santilli's attorney failed to timely file a jury demand. Construing CR 38, the trial court found that Santilli waived trial by jury and, in its discretion, denied his later motions…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bennett v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Moreman v. ButcherWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Seattle v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Seattle v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Ford Motor Co. v. BarrettWashington Supreme Court · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sackett v. SantilliWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Sackett v. SantilliWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re C.b.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Diamaco, Inc. v. MettlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. SeemsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.