Legal Opinion

Sackett v. Santilli

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2002No. 70163-6PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

47 P.3d 948 (2002)

146 Wash.2d 498

Russell and Carolyn SACKETT, Respondents,

v.

Thomas A. SANTILLI, Petitioner.

No. 70163-6.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued May 15, 2001.

Decided June 13, 2002.

Leonard Flanagan, Sheila McGaughey, Bellevue, Wiggins Law Offices, Charles Wiggins, Kenneth Masters, Bainbridge, for Petitioner.

Peery, Hiscock, Pierson & Ryder, Charles Peery, David Corey, Seattle, for Respondents.

Bryan Harnetiaux, Debra Stephens, Spokane, amicus curiae on behalf of Wash. State Trial Lawyers Assoc.

IRELAND, J.

Defendant driver Thomas A. Santilli contends that CR 38(d), which provides…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In re ClohertyWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. State Ex Rel. Foster-Wyman Lumber Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. State v. FieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Diversified Investment Partnership v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Saldivar v. MomahCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. Saldivar v. MomahCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. State v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. State v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. State v. DavidCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API