Central State Bank v. Hanson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Thirteen promissory notes executed to defendant by as many different persons were transferred to plaintiff bank and payment of each thereof was guaranteed by defendant. This action was brought on the guaranties. The court directed a verdict for plaintiff and defendant appeals from an order denying a new trial.
That the bank was the owner and holder of the notes and that defendant had guaranteed payment of them was admitted. The *270only question presented is whether the court erred in excluding defendant’s offer to prove the following facts: That the notes were secured by mortgage — one…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Farley v. ByersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Hungerford v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Bernick v. McClureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- First National Bank v. SchirmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- D. M. Osborne & Co. v. GulliksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Markville State Bank v. SteinbringSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- In Re RobertsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Holbert v. WermerskirchenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- S. T. McKnight Co. v. TomkinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Cessna Finance Corp. v. DwireCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.