Zitterkopf v. Roussalis
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RAPER, Justice.
As has been our frequent wont, we are compelled to call to the attention of appellants, the firmly implanted rule of appellate practice that in the review of a case here on appeal, we must assume that evidence in favor of the successful party is true, leave out of consideration entirely evidence of the unsuccessful party in conflict therewith, and give to the evidence of the successful party every favorable inference which may be reasonably and fairly drawn from it. Tavares v. Horstman, Wyo.1975, 542 P.2d 1275, 1277, and references there footnoted. Further, when we are not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
- Tavares v. HorstmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Heyl v. HeylWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
- Black & Yates, Inc. v. Negros-Philippine Lumber Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- McBain v. PrattAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Rissler & McMurry Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Duffy v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- True v. Hi-Plains Elevator MacHinery, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- UNC Teton Exploration Drilling, Inc. v. PeytonWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Robert W. Anderson House-Wrecking & Excavating, Inc. v. Board of TrusteesWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.