Legal Opinion

Tavares v. Horstman

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1975No. 4481PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAPER, Justice.

We are going to affirm the trial court and discuss three primary issues in the following light: (1) The rule of caveat emptor (let the buyer beware) does not apply to the sale of new housing by a builder-vendor to the vendee; (2) There is an implied warranty of liability that goes with the sale of new housing by a builder-vendor to the vendee; (3) Damages are recoverable by a vendee for negligent design and construction of new housing by the builder-vendor. Appellant’s counsel with commendable candor contemplated this court’s concurrence in those current concepts but seeks…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Humber v. MortonTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. ELDERKIN Et Ux. v. GasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Carpenter v. DonohoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  5. Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Redarowicz v. OhlendorfIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Sinclair Wyoming Refining v. A & B BuildersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
  3. ABC Builders, Inc. v. PhillipsWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Moxley v. Laramie Builders, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing Homeowners Ass'n v. Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing, LCUtah Supreme Court · 2009

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API