Legal Opinion

Aliquippa National Bank v. Harvey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 28, 1940No. Appeal, 138PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

When properly culled from the voluminous testimony in this case the facts reduce themselves to two controlling issues, one concerning itself with the extent of the inherent powers of the cashier and president of a bank, the other with the sufficiency of the evidence of fraud to invalidate a written instrument.

Defendant, Edward Harvey, 1 who was the owner of a theatre property in Aliquippa, in 1928 executed a long-term lease thereof to Anthony Jim with an agreement to sell the theatre to him upon the payment of certain installments. There was a mortgage on the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Bank of United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Bank of Hooversville v. SagersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Broida v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. United States v. City Bank of ColumbusSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  5. Ralston v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Matter of LarsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. YOUNG v. KayeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Thomas A. Beardshall and Annamae Beardshall, His Wife v. Minuteman Press International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Gerfin v. Colonial Smelting & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API