Grange Nat. Bank, Etc. v. Collman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Frazer,
This appeal, from the affirmance by the Superior Court of judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, was allowed only because of the constitutional question raised. The other questions presented by appellant have been ably determined in the opinion of Judge Linn of the Superior Court, 103 Pa. Superior Ct. 235, and we shall regard them as settled.
Plaintiff, a state bank, as holder in due course, brought suit against Coliman, maker of three 90-day, negotiable, promissory notes, the subject of this controversy. They total $2,300. Each note…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Yetter v. Delaware Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Lincoln Deposit & Trust Co. v. SankerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Bennar v. Central Mausoleum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Grange Natl. Bank v. CollmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
3Cited by16 opinions
- McCandless v. FurlaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Roberts v. Fireman's Ins. Co. of NJSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Bourd v. BermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Horsfield, Exrx. v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Bradford County Telephone Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.