Legal Opinion

State v. Dougall

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1977No. 44435PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.

The trial court denied petitioner's motion to dismiss a criminal action against him for failure to state an offense. We reverse.

On June 4, 1975, an order was published in the Federal Register designating diazepam (Valium) a controlled substance under federal law. The Washington legislature did not designate or reschedule Valium as a controlled substance by amending the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, RCW 69.50, and the Washington State Board of Pharmacy (Board) did not designate or reschedule it as a controlled substance pursuant to the hearing and notice requirements of the Administrative…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. City of Seattle v. DrewWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Blondheim v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. City of Seattle v. PullmanWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State Ex Rel. Kirschner v. UrquhartWashington Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. ErmertWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Woodson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. WorrellWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Diversified Investment Partnership v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1989

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API