State v. Dougall
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.
The trial court denied petitioner's motion to dismiss a criminal action against him for failure to state an offense. We reverse.
On June 4, 1975, an order was published in the Federal Register designating diazepam (Valium) a controlled substance under federal law. The Washington legislature did not designate or reschedule Valium as a controlled substance by amending the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, RCW 69.50, and the Washington State Board of Pharmacy (Board) did not designate or reschedule it as a controlled substance pursuant to the hearing and notice requirements of the Administrative…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- City of Seattle v. DrewWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Blondheim v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Seattle v. PullmanWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Kirschner v. UrquhartWashington Supreme Court · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. ErmertWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Woodson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. WorrellWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Diversified Investment Partnership v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1989
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.