State v. Worrell
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Andersen, J.—
Facts of Case
In this case we consider the constitutionality of the kidnapping in the first degree statute under the due process void-for-vagueness doctrine and conclude that the statute is not unconstitutionally vague.
In late 1986, the defendant James E. Worrell, Jr., went to a construction site and forced John Bishop at gunpoint to leave the site with him. He took Bishop to the retail shop of the defendant's wife at a local shopping mall. As the defendant himself declared in his written statement on plea of guilty, he took him there "with the intent of either doing great bodily…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Tacoma v. LuveneWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 2001
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.