Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Drew

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1967No. 38704PublishedCited by 122 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Weaver, J. —

The alpha and omega of this case is the constitutionality of a Seattle ordinance which makes it a crime for any person loitering abroad, or abroad under suspicious circumstances, to fail to give a satisfactory account of himself upon the demand of any police officer.

The ordinance (Seattle Code § 12.11.290) provides that:

It shall be unlawful for any person wandering or loitering abroad, or abroad under other suspicious circumstances, from one-half hour after sunset to one-half 'hour before sunrise, to fail to give a satisfactory account of himself upon the demand of any police…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Thompson v. City of LouisvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by122 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. GrisbyWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. EckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  4. State v. MacIolekWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. DixonWashington Supreme Court · 1971

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API