Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Kirschner v. Urquhart

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1957No. 34059PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

Relator invokes the original jurisdiction of this court in mandamus to compel respondent director of licenses to issue her a license to practice medicine. With commendable candor, the attorney general concedes the truth of relator’s factual allegations. She alleges American citizenship and that she received the degree of doctor of medicine from the University of Vienna in 1937, and has served the required statutory internship and met all other statutory requirements for the license, except the respondent denies accreditation by the Association of American Medical Colleges, and the council of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Brock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Florida Industrial Commission v. State Ex Rel. Orange State Oil Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1945
  4. Smithberger v. BanningNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  5. City of Tucson v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. KolocotronisWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Woodson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API