Legal Opinion

Murr v. Cohn

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1927No. Docket No. 5974PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiffs commenced an action against the defendant to quiet title to certain personal property. The defendant answered and a trial was had in the trial court before the court sitting without a jury. The trial court made findings in favor of the plaintiffs and the defendant has appealed.

The defendant owned lots 18 and 19 in Block “K” of the city of Oxnard. He leased the lots to the plaintiffs for a period of five years. At that time the lots were wholly vacant. When the plaintiffs entered into possession they placed on the property “one field portable gasoline station, one gasoline air…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Hendy v. DinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Gosliner v. BrionesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Jahnke v. JahnkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. R. Barcroft & Sons Co. v. CullenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. People v. ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd. v. Unosuke HigashiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. First Federal Trust Co. v. StockflethCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Frazier v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API