Legal Opinion
Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd. v. Unosuke Higashi
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 19, 1943No. Civ. 12183PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J. pro tem.
This action was brought by the Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd., to foreclose a chattel mortgage originally given to the hank in 1931 by one Higashi, and subsequently renewed. The city of Monterey was joined as a defendant and filed a cross-complaint to quiet title to a portion of the property sought to he foreclosed. From a judgment quieting the title of the city of Monterey to a building supported by piles driven into the land under Monterey Bay and a refrigerating plant and attachments installed in said building the plaintiff appealed. Since the outbreak of the war with Japan…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Weber v. Board of Harbor CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Kenney v. KenneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- People ex rel. Teschemacher v. DavidsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Berry v. Emery, Bird, Thayer Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948
- Timberidge Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- San Jose Abstract & Title Insurance v. ElliottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Weisz Trucking Co. v. Emil R. Wohl ConstructionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Packer v. SillasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.