Legal Opinion

People v. Ballard

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1905No. Crim. No. 4PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Frank H. Dunne, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, P. J.

The appellant was convicted in the superior court for San Francisco of the crime of robbery, and has appealed from the judgment thereon and also from an order denying him a new trial.

The prosecuting witness, Thomas Cronan, upon whom the robbery was committed, was not present at the trial, and the district attorney offered to read in evidence the transcript of his testimony given before the police court at the preliminary examination of the defendant; and for the purpose of laying the foundation for reading the same introduced evidence of his absence from the city, and of the efforts to secure…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. LewandowskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. PlylerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. People v. KuranoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Meldrum v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Valuenzuela v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Ex Parte BallardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API