Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Ballard

California Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1906No. Crim. No. 1308PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directed to the Sheriff of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This is a petition by IT. H. MeCloskey, on behalf of Frank Ballard, for the latter’s discharge on habeas corpus from the custody of the sheriff of the city and county of San Francisco. His claim to be'discharged is based on the provision of section 1262 of the Penal Code, which is as follows: “If a judgment against the defendant is reversed without ordering a new trial, the appellate court must if he is in custody direct him to be discharged therefrom.” In the petition for the writ in the cause at bar the statement of the facts relied on for a discharge are very meager, and are, in substance,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. Lee LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. HardissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. People v. BallardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Odlum v. DuffyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. People v. WelchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. State v. SlaterIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  4. People v. BallardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API