Legal Opinion

People v. Kuranoff

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 29, 1950No. Crim. 4493PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Defendant was convicted of second degree robbery by the court sitting without a jury. The charge was that he had forcibly taken $869 from the person of Florence L. Nicholas. Mrs. Nicholas was not present at the trial. The court, over the objection of defendant, permitted the People to read in evidence her testimony taken at the preliminary examination of the defendant. Defendant urges that it was not shown that Mrs. Nicholas could not, with due diligence, be found within the state.

Penal Code, section 686, provides that in a criminal prosecution the defendant is entitled “to be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. McFarlaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. People v. LewandowskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. People v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. People v. MuellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. CarswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. United States v. StringerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. People v. BenjaminCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. FranquelinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API