Legal Opinion

Searcy v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1937No. 32,940PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action whereby the state highway commission condemned ground for highway construction purposes. The landowner appealed from the award made by the appraisers. A *710•greater amount than was allowed by the appraisers was allowed by the district court. The highway commission appeals from that judgment.

The land condemned is 1.5 acres, which comprised a part of a five-acre tract just outside the city of Tribune. The tract was bordered on the east by state highway 27 and on the north by high'way 9,6. The land taken was a strip off each side…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Saint Joseph & Denver City R. R. v. OrrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  3. Atlanta, Birmingham & Atlantic Railroad v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  4. Chicago, Kansas & Nebraska Railway Co. v. BroquetSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  5. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hudson v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. Rostine v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Mooney v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. United States v. Kansas City, Kan.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  5. Condemnation of Land for School Purposes Ridglea, Inc. v. Unified School District No. 305Supreme Court of Kansas · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API