Cummings v. Edwards-Wood Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
In an action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover fifty thousand dollars damages for injury to plaintiff’s business by reason of an alleged conspiracy on the part of defendant corporation and its officers to destroy it, plaintiff began garnishment proceedings against the St. Paul National Bank and two other banks to reach the funds of defendants. From an order of the court, Kelly, J., directing the discharge of the garnishee, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
On June 2, 1905, the following opinion was filed:
2Per curiam
A motion by the defendants to dismiss the appeal herein, or, in case that is denied, that the rules be relaxed, and this appeal be set down for hearing at the present term, was brought on for heáring on an order to show cause.
1. The appeal was from an order of the district court of the county of Ramsey discharging garnishment proceedings herein, and discharging the garnishees. It is the contention of the defendants that the *119order is not appealable. In Croft v. Miller, 26 Minn. 317, 4 N. W. 45, it was held that an order for judgment against a…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Croft v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Ryan Drug Co. v. PeacockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- McConnell v. RaknessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Pennsylvania Insurance v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
4Cited by4 opinions
- Gustafson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Quevli Farms, Inc. v. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Ridgway v. MirkovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Mahlberg v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929