Legal Opinion

Ridgway v. Mirkovich

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 22, 1934No. 30,074PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss her appeal because moot and for taxing her costs was denied. An appellant may not dismiss his appeal and tax costs and disbursements against a respondent. Now respondent moves to dismiss the appeal because moot and for costs.

Ill-advised procedure has consumed the time of lawyers and courts to no purpose. Plaintiff after a trial obtained a judgment against-defendant in the municipal court of Minneapolis, July 27, 1929. A transcript thereof was docketed in the district court of Hennepin county, and an execution issued thereon to the sheriff of Sherburn county, who…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haycock v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Cummings v. Edwards-Wood Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Muggenburg Ex Rel. Muggenburg v. LeightonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Manemann v. WestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. West v. ManemannCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  4. In re Arbitration Between Public Building Service & Hospital & Institutional Employees Union Local 113Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API