Quevli Farms, Inc. v. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
This is an action for slander of title. The appeal is from an order setting aside a writ of attachment and the levy thereunder on the ground that the statute does not authorize an attachment in such an action.
The statute as originally enacted authorized an attachment in any action for the recovery of money whether sounding in tort or contract. Davidson v. Owens, 5 Minn. 50 (69) ; Cummings v. Edwards-Wood Co. 95 Minn. 118, 108 N. W. 709, 106 N. W. 304. It has been amended to read as follows:
“In an action for the recovery of money, other than for libel, slander, seduction, breach of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilson v. DuboisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- McDonald v. GreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Haycock v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Pennsylvania Insurance v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
- Macurda v. Globe Newspaper Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Advanced Training Systems Inc. v. Caswell Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Gustafson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Hayward Farms Co. v. Union Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Wolff v. Bank of New York MellonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Brinkman v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.