McConnell v. Rakness
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the district court for Murray •county, Perkins, J., presiding, discharging Dickson, the garnishee, ■after a disclosure which showed that he claimed certain property, formerly belonging to the defendant, Rakness, under the assignment •from him which is mentioned in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
The plaintiffs in this ease appeal from an order made in the district court, releasing and discharging a garnishee, after examination, from all liability under proceedings in garnishment. The' respondents contend, upon the authority of Croft v. Miller, 26 Minn. 317, (4 N. W. Rep. 45,) that such an order is not appealable, and hence the appeal should be dismissed. In that case the attempt was made to remove to this court an order for judgment against a garnishee. In holding that it could not be done, but that judgment as *4directed must first be entered, and an appeal taken from such judgment,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- May v. WalkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Croft v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- In re the Assignment of BirdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bristol v. BrentUtah Supreme Court · 1909
- Duxbury v. ShanahanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Carolina, C. & O. Railroad v. ShewalterTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
- Maclaren v. KramarNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Cummings v. Edwards-Wood Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.