Legal Opinion
Arnold v. Wittie
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 27, 1924No. 12445PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RAY, C.
Plaintiff, claiming ownership under a conditional sales contract, commenced this action of replew against the First National Bank of Mangum, mortgagee in possession, to recover the possession of an automobile. The case was tried on the following statement of facts;
“The plaintiff and defendant stipulate and agree that the following is the undisputed facts in this case:. ‘‘That the plaintiff sold the Dodge car which is the subject of this replevin action to Frank Wittie for $500 and took a note for $500 dated at Eldorado, Kan., May 27, 1919, signed by Frank Wittie for the car…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Greenville National Bank v. Evans-Snyder-Buel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Shafer v. National Cash Register Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wilson Motor Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Morgan v. Stanton Auto Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Hinds v. Atlas Acceptance CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- New v. MaloneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Cassity v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.