Legal Opinion

Susquehanna Transmission Co. v. St. Clair

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 14, 1910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Cross-appeals from the Circuit Court for Harford County (Van Bibber, J.).

1Opinion of the CourtBriscoe, J.

These are cross-appeals from the Circuit Court for Harford County, in equity, under Article 5, section 31 of the Code of Public General Laws, and by an agreement the two appeals were heard at the conclusion of the April Term of this Court. On the 23rd of June, 1910, a per curiam order was passed announcing our conclusion in the case, to the effect that so much of the order as granted the injunction to prevent interference on the part of the defendant with the construction of the telephone line proposed by the complainant must be reversed, and that part of the order denying the injunction to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Van Bibber v. FerdinandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
  2. Woods v. EarlySupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  3. Russell v. Merchants' Bank of Lake CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Swartzbaugh v. SampsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Dalton v. Real Estate & Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Young v. CockmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  4. Maas v. MaasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  5. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co. v. Ministers of the Starr M. P. ChurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API